Archive for January, 2009

Observations: Devices – January 10, 2009

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

The Old and the New

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

I just got around to posting the last of my “December” posts – on research.  I’ve been pretty busy the past couple of weeks, so haven’t had time to dig through all the web sites of the various research firms to finish out this post.  Although published 10 days into the new year, this post effectively represents the last of my 2008 posts.

The new year brings an opportunity to look at the world differently.  Over the past few months, I’ve noticed that the bulk of my personal interest and (undoubtedly relatedly) the bulk of my posts have been the collections of links I label “Business Observations”.  As I kick off 2009, I’ve decided to step away from my old categories (Capturing the Power, Managing the Danger, Indicators, etc.) and move towards collections of Observations.  I imagine I’ll play around with different categories for a couple of months, but I’ve been gathering enough observations over the past few weeks to have a pretty good idea of buckets to start with.  I hope to post my first post under this new categorization later today, so it’s out with the old and in with the new.

I look forward to any feedback on this new approach.  Happy New Year!

Recent Research: December 2008

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

Research is good. Free highlights from expensive research reports are great. Here are some recent headlines:

Inquiring Minds Want to Know

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

This past semester, my book The Power of Mobility, was used in a senior level class taught at Baker University. The professor, Nan Hickman, asked for my permission to let the students ask questions of me. I received a number of insightful queries. Over the next week or so, I plan to use this space to answer some of those questions.

The first question is “If you went to talk to a business about using mobile apps versus pc-used apps for their business, what is the first thing you’d want to cover?”

When talking to businesses about capturing the power of mobility, I always put it in the context of the evolution of technology. Businesses need to realize that mobility enables stuff that simply wasn’t possible before – just as the Internet did and just as the PC did. There are applications that still make sense to reside in a data center, applications that still make sense to run on a desktop PC, those that still make sense to operate from inside a browser. But, now, it’s possible to have an application running on a mobile device.

And for some parts of a business, that possibility creates tremendous opportunities for driving efficiency, differentiation, or customer loyalty. If you can take a process or some information to new places, because of mobility, and by doing so create new value, then good business management requires pursuing that opportunity.

I often use Avis as an example. A long time ago, way before today’s mobile technologies were feasible, Avis took the simple process of returning rental cars, and by introducing a mobile application on a mobile device (and calling it Roaming Rapid Returns), they took the process to where the customer was, dramatically improving the customer experience, and forcing the entire industry to follow their lead. I then ask if there are similar opportunities in the industry being served by the business with whom I’m speaking.

Beyond the Phone: December 2008

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

Bonus: Intel Hopes for Healthy Growth in Medical Devices
Converging products into a cellphone is one way that mobility is getting built into every product, but it’s not the only way. Every month, I’ll focus on devices that are integrating the power of mobility into products themselves in ways that create new value for the customer. Power up!

Big Bell Dogma: December 2008

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

Bonus: Brad Reed asks “Does the AT&T breakup still matter 25 years on?

As we work to build mobility into every product, service, and process, our greatest inhibitor is the mindset represented by those who defend the tethering of products and processes to specific places. This mindset is fueled by the investments that have been made that establish power in the companies, departments, and individuals that stand in the way of mobilizing our lives and our businesses. These investments are not always in hard assets, but often are investments of time and experience to establish intellectual and relational assets. We should expect our assault on these ways to be defended to the death. Here are recent examples: