Comments on: Big Bell Dogma: November 2009 http://mcguireslaw.com/2009/12/03/big-bell-dogma-november-2009/ The value of any product or service increases with its mobility. Sun, 19 Mar 2017 02:11:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.16 By: Mike Smith http://mcguireslaw.com/2009/12/03/big-bell-dogma-november-2009/#comment-2705 Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:34:38 +0000 http://mcguireslaw.com/?p=3479#comment-2705 Russ,

You asked last week if Sprint should engage in the battle between AT&T and VZ or remain on the sidelines. I believe Sprint should actively engage. Primarily because they are beginning to define the terms of battle in a way that strongly benefits Sprint: around data networks.

Imagine an ad comparing Sprint’s voice network footprint and performance to AT&T and VZ, Sprint’s 3G footprint and performance to theirs, and concluding with a view of 4G markets served and apps supported. Sprint clearly positions itself as leading the mobility revolution, starting with the path to 4G. The theoretical ad described here could end with the following question: “Blazing-fast 4G and the apps it enables. Verizon and AT&T, do you have a map for THAT?”

The more I think about it, the more surprised I am that Sprint isn’t already shoving that message down their throats. Sprint has placed the biggest bets of any company on the future of mobile network technology. It’s high time Sprint reminded the world (including competitors) that’s the case.

]]>